In searching what different global authorities are doing about the Iraqi Refugee crisis I find mixed messages as always. Laurie's article inspired me to compare different reactions from non-governmental organizations. Her article was from Human Rights Watch which, in principle, is a similar organization to Amnesty International (AI). When browsing their site, I found a straight forward article about their approach to the problem. It was published in June 2008. AI is calling upon the international community for financial assistance, an end in deportations and the creation of/permission to seek legal employment. This seems to be a standard response to a refugee crisis, but as indicated in a more recent article published by Human Rights Watch in November 2008, Greece is systematically gathering Iraqi refugees and sending them to Turkey and denying almost all asylum claims. I have a hard time trusting that non-governmental non-profits have enough clout to make a change in a problem this vast.
So, on to the United State's role in the situation. Obama claimed in campagin, as indicated on his website, that he would allocate 2 billion dollars "to expand services to Iraqi refugees in neighboring countries, and ensure that Iraqis inside their own country can find sanctuary." This was a claim he made in his campaign, but now, realizing the shrinking budget and growing problems, I believe that humanitarian efforts in Iraq may be the first sort of efforts to be cut from the budget allocations. Proof for this claim is found in this facinating Pro-Publica (journalism in the public interest) article that is a story on the tracking of the White House website's changes in official agendas.
Basically, the US government's Iraq agenda is changing, and I think that all evidence points to a lack of support for Iraqi refugees in the future. In my opinion, it is the United States' responsibility to support (at least in some ways, if not comprehensively) Iraqi refugees. It is time for the US government to take some responsibility for the mistakes that have been commited.
The question I am left with is how do we support the refugees? Perhaps creating re-settlement programs here in our country seeing as many refugees are not able to return because their communities are broken. I am not sure that pouring funds into supporting refugees in surrounding countries is such a good idea, but may me more plausable than creating yet another re-settlement plan. The next obvious step seems to make Iraq safe for civilians to live there, stop violence but assit the new government in maintaing non-violence and post-war reconsruction efforts. I am not sure that I have cleared anything up, but more presented a question of how to actually support the "official" 4.7 million that have been displaced by the war. (I say "official" because I assume there are millions more that have been displaced within Iraq and are not registered "refugees")
ok it's Iraq but it's interesting
-
Here is a link to a blog put up by Morgan on a different Blog. There are a
number of entries that tie more to your topic than theirs. Enjoy.
15 years ago
Posts
The question of support is quite difficult in this situation, and I think it becomes even harder to predict now that we're under a new administration. I feel that creating resettlement programs within the US would almost seem like an admittance of "failure" and that it would create a precedent for refugees from other countries we've had a hand in destroying.
ReplyDeleteThe US wants Iraq to come off as a success, a democratized free sovereign country, so most likely the government will want Iraqis to stay put. I think your points about the next obvious steps are the most constructive thing we can do now, since it is hard to overstep national boundaries to address refugees in other countries like Lebanon.
I feel like the UN, and the international community has a duty to assist Iraqi refugees right now. There are plenty of international agreements outlining the rights of refugees and the duties of countries receiving them. Maybe the US should focus its efforts on rebuilding the country, including neighborhoods and areas that have been destroyed. Obviously we should keep our doors open to refugees but it's better for people not to be displaced at all, and that requires rebuilding, which also could show that we admit to our mistake or at least are committed to the fixing the problem we started.